Well, if you have ever used a Masterfile image on your website, and you do not have the proper license details, I would suggest you remove it immediately. MasterFile, a Canadian stock agency is on a raid to make some fast money out of innocent website owners.
Usually, a business owner does not create his own site. He gets it done through a third-party and he does pay for it. He usually does not have any clue about the details of images used on his website, where it came from, the licenses and when it was bought etc. Am I right? Some websites may have been created 5 – 10 years back and most of us do not keep any detailed record of it.
Masterfile has created a crawler which can match and identify site owners who have infringed copyrighted material. Once it finds out, it just creates a big Infringement Claim and asks the site owner to pay thousands of dollars. It also includes an invoice with the mail. If you have two images from MasterFile, then you can expect anywhere from $10,000 to $15,000 invoice from Masterfile. Yes, that’s how MasterFile is making fast money. Maybe they realized this way they could make more money than selling images on their website.
I am not speaking in favor of copyright theft as I do understand the time, effort and money invested in copyrighting a material and the loss incurred due to theft and illegal use. However, a firm cease and desist notice could be the right thing to do and if the website owner does not take necessary step, then a legal notice can be sent.
Site owners who have got this infringement suit, tried calling up Masterfile to discuss about this issue and to let them know their innocence. But in vain. Masterfile just bargains and gives them a consideration but still it would end up in a huge pay out. If you are not willing to pay still, then you would start getting threatening calls from an recovery agent who will get 20% commission on successful recovery.
Here is what the OCILLA claims:
Title II: Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act
DMCA Title II, the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act (“OCILLA”, creates a safe harbor for online service providers (OSPs, including ISPs) against copyright liability if they adhere to and qualify for certain prescribed safe harbor guidelines and promptly block access to allegedly infringing material (or remove such material from their systems) if they receive a notification claiming infringement from a copyright holder or the copyright holder’s agent. OCILLA also includes a counternotification provision that offers OSPs a safe harbor from liability to their users, if the material upon notice from such users claiming that the material in question is not, in fact, infringing. OCILLA also provides for subpoenas to OSPs to provide their users’ identity.
Website owners and designers beware of these stock websites especially Getty Images and MasterFile as they are on an Internet crawl to make money from innocent website owners and the law is on their side.
I got the mail saying I owed 2400.00 for an image on my website. The rest of the prices for images were not that high on the Masterfile website.I closed down my website immediately. Pay this scammer off and there will be a lineup of others saying you used their photos. There should be watermarks to protect images if they are copyrighted and images can be blocked from being copied.
I am also a victim on Masterfile. We hired a programmer from India paid him $100 to build site in 2 hrs. Now we have harrassing letter from Masterfile for $12000.00. I am not sure what to do. We are 2 people company and losses in for last 3 years. We thought of closing down the business last yearend. But thought of waiting for another year to see whether any luck comes in this year to get back atleast the invested money. But it ended up in this way.Any help or information sharing from such experiences will definitely help us now. We are not in a position to hire an attorney for this as we are almost dead. I am sure any attorney will charge at least $1000.00 and we are not even in a position to pay that. Any suggestions will help us at this time.
Thanking in advance
I am also a victim on Masterfile. We hired a programmer from India paid him $100 to build site in 2 hrs. Now we have harrassing letter from Masterfile for $12000.00. I am not sure what to do. We are 2 people company and losses in for last 3 years. We thought of closing down the business last yearend. But thought of waiting for another year to see whether any luck comes in this year to get back atleast the invested money. But it ended up in this way.
Any help or information sharing from such experiences will definitely help us now. We are not in a position to hire an attorney for this as we are almost dead. I am sure any attorney will charge at least $1000.00 and we are not even in a position to pay that.
Any suggestions will help us at this time.
Thanking in advance
Now I’d like to stress what any of you should already be aware of.
If for instance you bought for a really unusually and suspiciously cheap price some goods, usually retailing for a much heftier price, you’d get the thought that those goods would be stolen. Buying stolen goods is internationally considered a crime lesser than stealing but nevertheless will be charged for misdemeanor.
If you run a company and book someone to design a wensite for your business it should be your duty to ask yourself “where is my designer getting artwork from”? “Is it all been licensed? I am sorry but you are not victims , possibly out of ignorance, allowing it wasn’t done maliciously, but co-perpetrators of using intellectual property illegally especially at this day and age where Royalty Free is really cheap and widely available, there is no excuse for using artwork without the appropriate licenses.
So I have a brand new Corvette “High resolution stock photos that look really cool” And I decide to park it in let’s say Baghdad, Iraq “The Internet” one of the most crime ridden places in the world, with the doors unlocked and the keys in the ignition. “Lack of password protection or warning of copyright infringement” Should I be surprised if the Corvette “High resolution stock photos that look really cool” gets stolen?
So I have a brand new Corvette “High resolution stock photos that look really cool” And I decide to park it in let’s say Baghdad, Iraq “The Internet” one of the most crime ridden places in the world, with the doors unlocked and the keys in the ignition. “Lack of password protection or warning of copyright infringement” Should I be surprised if the Corvette “High resolution stock photos that look really cool” gets stolen? F$%@ YOU MASTERFILE!
The fact remains that service providers have no special incentive to keep an eye on the cyber activities of users or for restricting a potentially infringing content. Hence, service providers should be held accountable only if they do not remove illegal content despite complaint from the copyright owner. I Read some on http://www.lawisgreek.com/cyber-laws-liability-for-infringement-of-copyright/
I am a victim of MasterFile, I had an Indian web designer that use to work for me… make a design and he used (but changed) a photo possibly from MasterFile… I am not sure where he got it.. but the photo is on MasterFile now.
As soon as I knew they had an issue with the photo I removed it from the site. This site is for a grave restorer… not a hugely profitable company… I am just a small website design company. I did the site for free even in exchange for my 5th Great Grandfathers grave to be restored.
At first they were asking for $10,000 but after I told MasterFile the my story… how small and non profitable this site was… I made nothing from it. They reduced their number to $1,000 but I had a set time to accept that and pay that or they would take the file to litigation. Still $1,000 is a lot to me and I don’t feel I should have to pay it.
So now at a bit of a loss of what to do.